As a house game, I recently played someone rated 947. I am rated 2179. I won the game, and gained 1 rating point!? I expected to gain nothing from that. Why should I gain anything at all, since I out-rate him by 1200 points? Is this an error/fault of the rating system?
Rating changes are always rounded up (if positive) or down (if negative). You gained a small fraction of a rating point, and that was rounded up to one point.
I was looking at that event main.uschess.org/assets/msa_joom … 1-12630415
and I was wondering why the second highest rated player would be paired in round one against player 11 in a 13-player event (12 received the first round bye). Then I saw that players 5, 6, 8 and 9 all had first round half-point byes and thus the pairings (with an assumption that the wall chart supplement ratings resulted in the pre-tournament 1409 being 11 and the pre-tournament 1353 being 10) were a very reasonable:
1-7
2-10
3-11
4-13(unrated)
12-bye
I don’t remember another event where almost the entire middle skipped the first round.
You were being accomodating in giving a game to number 12.
You deduced well that I was being accommodating by giving #12 a game - he and I rode 1 hour together (for a one game per week event) only to find he wasn’t going to play at all that night. So, I played on two boards at once.
To avoid all the byes (if everybody agrees), you can set up the tables in a 5-pointed starfish arrangement and have everybody play two games at once. After just two of these double rounds, the round-robin is complete.
Nolan just corrected me. After the post-tournament rating is calculated, it is rounded up or down to a whole number. So next tournament’s pre-tournament rating will also be a whole number. WileCoyote’s explanation is correct.