While it could be both I know for a fact that it is not the case here. The reporter just got it wrong. I find that reporters mean well but get the “chess facts” a bit mixed up.
The reporter was provided all of the proper information. After the online version of the article came out he was contacted to make the correction but it didn’t happen.
Funny how people choose to rag on the inaccuracy of the reporter instead of saying ‘great that a newspaper covered the event’.
And by the way - Pioneer Press also covered it both online and print edition: