I had this idea, it won’t ever come to fruition because I’m not wealthy and could never afford to put on such a tournament however:
A tournament of champions (kind of like the us masters in golf) where anyone who has ever won a us (mens) championship would be eligible to participate.
So yeah, that’s my idea, maybe when the uscf gets some money together they could organize something like that.
We used to have the annual Lone Pine tournament, funded by the Piatigorsky family. Gregor Piatigorsky was a significant cellist and played in a “dream trio” with Jascha Heifetz and Artur Rubinstein.
(My advance apologies if this correction is, well, incorrect. But I believe I have my history right.)
The Lone Pine tournament series was funded by Louis Statham. In fact, the tournament’s actual name was the Louis D. Statham Masters, but it was known as the Lone Pine International. The tournament ran throughout the 1970s, and ended as Statham’s health declined. (The last Lone Pine event was 1981; Statham died in 1983.)
The Piatigorsky Cups were the tournaments funded by Gregor and Jacqueline Piatigorsky. I believe there were only two of those (something like 1963 and 1966?).
Lone pine is not what i was referring to, that was just a strong tournament that occurred in the past, like foxwoods, not just any strong player would be invited, it would be specifically geared towards those who achieved the title of US champion.
Actually, Lone Pine is more accurately compared with the Midwest Masters (now US Masters), although the entry requirements for Lone Pine were extremely strict. For example, there were years where it was only open to GMs, IMs, USCF senior masters, and juniors over 2300.
Your specific proposal is interesting, though irrespective of USCF’s financial health, I don’t think it will happen unless some wealthy patron cracks open his/her piggy bank.
Golf has a couple of events that kind of parallel yours, but neither follows your specific format requirements (for good reason, I believe). The Mercedes Championships, which opens the US PGA season, invites only the winners of PGA TOUR events from the previous season. Also, the Masters invites all its previous champions to play every year (although they have started actively discouraging past champions at or beyond the age range of 60-65 from playing).
Perhaps a hybrid of your idea would be to invite the winner of every major open tournament in the country during a previous defined 12-month period, plus every past US Champion. (This would require a definition of “major open tournament”; a possible idea might be “any tournament offering a first prize of $5,000 or more.”) You’ll have an easier time making a decent-sized field, and the major-open winner restriction should keep it pretty competitive.
For the sake of reference, here is a list of living former US champions: L. Alburt, J. Benjamin, A. Bisguier, W. Browne, R. Byrne, L. Christiansen, N. de Firmian, R. Dzindzichashvili, J. Grefe, B. Gulko, A. Ivanov, G. Kamsky, L. Kavalek, H. Nakamura, A. Onischuk, S. Rachels, Y. Seirawan, A. Shabalov, Y. Shulman, M. Wilder, P. Wolff, A. Yermolinsky. A number of these players are inactive, for various reasons.
Introducing the concept of “the majors” in chess makes some sense. There are only 4 majors in golf, and the idea of keeping it at a high level, VERY elite, adds to the idea. Also, they are static. The tournaments don’t change.
Potential Majors in chess would likely include:
U.S. Open (300 GPP)
World Open (300 GPP)
National Open (200 GPP)
Chicago Open (200 GPP)
(I note that these are all at 200 GP points and up)
Possibilities include:
Philadelphia Open (200 GPP)
U.S. Masters?
New York International (200 GPP)
North American Open (200 GPP)
No other events seem to be at or above 200 GPP? But then I missed something.
Mike, would using Grand Prix points offered, as Kevin suggests, make qualifying events for this proposal more easily trackable? If so, I like the idea of the qualifying line being at 200 GPP. (Throw in the US Masters, in those years it is held.)
EDIT: To clarify, I would say the winner (or winners, in the event of a tie) of the open (or top) section in any event offering at least 200 GPP should qualify for this proposed event.
We do have records showing the number of Grand Prix points for events (back to 2005), since we need that information to compute the Grand Prix standings.
Here is a summary of all the Grand Prix events in the last 12 months (since 5/20/2011):
And here are all the events that had 100 or more Grand Prix points:
[code] Event ID Affiliate Event GP Points
201108074391 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN 4TH ANNUAL CLEVELAND OPEN! 100
201108146361 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN 2011 INDIANAPOLIS OPEN 100
201109044261 RALEIGH TOURNAMENT CHESS CLUB 2011 NORTH CAROLINA OPEN 100
201110096011 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN 8TH LOS ANGELES OPEN! 100
201110168291 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN 20TH MIDWEST CLASS CHAMPIONSHIPS! 100
201110303221 MARSHALL CHESS CLUB MCC CHAMPIONSHIP 100
201201297992 GREATER HENDERSON COUNTY CHESS LAND OF THE SKY XXV 100
201203115892 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN 19TH ANNUAL WESTERN CLASS! 100
201108146411 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN CONTINENTAL OPEN 120
201108280911 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN 43RD ANNUAL ATLANTIC OPEN! 120
201111273861 CHESS PALACE 47TH ANNUAL AMERICAN OPEN 120
201112304421 CHESS HOUSE 2011 EASTERN OPEN 120
201201161701 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN GOLDEN STATE OPEN 120
201204013892 ROCHESTER CHESS CENTER 34TH ANNUAL MARCHAND OPEN 2012 120
201107177631 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN 4TH CHICAGO CLASS CHAMPIONSHIPS! 150
201107177731 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN 16TH PACIFIC COAST OPEN! 150
201109054751 SAN DIEGO CHESS CLUB SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OPEN 2011 150
201110303181 MICHIGAN CHESS FESTIVAL LLC MICHIGAN INTERNATION CHESS FESTIVAL 150
201111138751 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN 20TH KINGS ISLAND OPEN! 150
201111273321 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN 42ND ANNUAL NATIONAL CHESS CONGRESS 150
201202207232 SAN DIEGO CHESS CLUB RECESSION BUSTER 150
201204086552 RENO CHESS CLUB 2012 RENO LARRY EVANS MEMORIAL 150
201106126551 VEGAS CHESS FESTIVALS NATIONAL OPEN CHAMPOINSHIP 200
201106219211 MARSHALL CHESS CLUB 4TH NEW YORK INTERNATIONAL 200
201106281721 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN PHILADELPHIA INTERNATIONAL 200
201108218881 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN MANHATTAN OPEN 200
201110106261 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN CONTINENTAL CLASS 200
201110231361 RENO CHESS CLUB WESTERN STATES OPEN 2011 200
201112294511 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN NORTH AMERICAN OPEN 200
201204086022 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN PHILADELPHIA OPEN 200
201105302021 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN CHICAGO OPEN 300
201107043831 CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSN 39TH ANNUAL WORLD OPEN 300
201108074461 US CHESS FEDERATION 112TH ANNUAL US OPEN - 2011 300
[/code]
It is worth noting that the Masters golf tournament invites all players who win PGA Tour events during the preceding 12 months. There may not be any comparable qualification process in chess.
I don’t think you implied this, but I don’t see inactivity as a reason for a player not playing. There are always going to be players on the bottom of the cross table somebody has to occupy that spot. I do like your idea of the hybrid though. Of course the inactive players would be more than welcome to decline the invitation. Again though I am of the opinion that if there was a hybrid it wouldn’t just be like Lone Pines entrance requirements, it wouldn’t be open to foreign players who are just strong players, it would only be open to players who had won large national tournaments and former us champs.
These are two separate concepts. I’ll address the first one here; the second effectively gets covered later in this reply.
My guess is that many of the inactive players are unlikely to play. This is based on reading comments they’ve made in interviews such as this one. That is part of the reason why I would look to find a way to get more players in - hence, the hybrid.
My personal thought is that such an event should have a minimum USCF rating requirement for the former US champions who are invited to play. (I would think that 2400 should be the bare minimum, and one could easily argue that it should really be 2500.) If a former US champion drops below that rating line, that player can be invited to give lectures and talks, or play simuls, or whatever - but putting them in the main field is not good.
Again, a golf parallel: several former Masters champions played well past the point where they could even hope to break 80, let alone actually make the cut after two rounds. They suffered the indignity of getting letters from Augusta National suggesting they no longer play the main event.
I would hope we could avoid either of the competitive or the PR pitfall, while preserving the competitive level of the event throughout the wallchart. As you say, someone has to be at the bottom of the wallchart. What is somewhat under the organizer’s control, though, is where the bottom of the wallchart stops.
I believe I gave an idea for entrance requirements to this proposed event that match the ones you’re mentioning here. In any event, I would say we’re in heated agreement on this.