(Here is a snip from the link…)
Spassky played with great caution and up to move 14, when Fischer deviated, both sides followed a game between Spassky and Krogius from 15 years back. Both players didn’t mind simplifications, and at move 28 all officers except a pair of black-squared Bishops had left the board.
I was telling someone that in chess an ‘officer’ was any non-pawn piece, but the person did not believe me. The above snip from the above link is evidence that the term is real.
We should use the term ‘officer’ more often, chess needs such a term.
.
I can’t agree with that. It’s an excellent book, as long as you don’t start to use his vocabulary. Every good player should understand the “sweeper-sealer twist,” for example.