Could I have won faster?

From this past weekend (November 10, 2018):

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Bg5 d5 4.Nc3 c6 5.e3 bNd7 6.Nf3 Bb4 7.cxd5 exd5 8.Bd3 Qa5 9.Qc2 Ne4

Huh?? Can’t I just win a pawn, with a crushing attack?

  1. Bxe4 Bxc3 11.bxc3 dxe4 12.Qxe4 Kf8 13.Qe7 Kg8 14.Qe8 Nf8

Now I got cold feet. Something like 15.Be7 Qxc3 16.Ke2 Qc2 17.Nd2?? Bg4 drops my queen. Other lines look dubious, too. He always seems to be able to get a check in with his c8 bishop.

Instead I continued:

  1. O-O h6 16.Be7 Qxc3 17.Qxf8 Kh7 18.Qxf7 and I’m “only” a piece and a pawn up. I had to win slowly, by normal non-flashy means.

Somehow I was hoping for something more spectacular, perhaps even involving a double rook sac at a1 and h1.

Can anybody find anything more audience-pleasing?

Bill Smythe

Does black do better with the following?
15 O-O b5 16 Be7 Bb7 or 16 Qxc6 Rb8

It looks like white would win a piece with
15 Be7 Qxc3+ 16 Ke2 Qc2+?? 17 Kf1
but black has better with
16 Ke2 Qc4+ 17 Ke1 Qc3+

You may have done as well as you can while black missed b5 to hold the piece

Hi,

As poorly as I played this past weekend, I hesitate to provide advice, but 14 Qe8+ looks wrong. 14 00! is better. By checking, you free the QB for Black, so any trades to a superior ending are less strong.

  1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Bg5 d5 4. Nc3 c6 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Nf3 Bb4 7. cxd5 exd5 8. Bd3 Qa5 9. Qc2 Ne4 10. Bxe4 Bxc3+ 11. bxc3 dxe4 12. Qxe4+ Kf8 13. Qe7+ Kg8 14. O-O seems better

Maybe one of these years I’ll purchase a chess program other than the WinTD pairing program I have on my computer. Until then I’ll continue analyzing the old fashioned way.

I like the idea of deferring Qe8+ and leaving the bishop blocked from g4.
14 … h6 still avoids dropping the piece, albeit with a very cramped position and a pawn down (the c3 pawn can be saved with Qd8+).
What about the following “brilliant” continuations trying to do better than that?
14 Ne5 (attacking f7, covering c4 and threatening Qe8)
14 … Qxc3+ 15 Ke2 Qc2+ 16 Kf1 Qf5 17 Qe8+ Nf8 18 Be7 h6 19 Qxf8+ Kh7 20 Qxf7 (winning a piece)
but black has
16 … h6 17 Qxf7+ Kh7 18 Nxd7 Bxd7 (18 … hg 19 Nf6+ Kh6 20 Qh5#) 19 Qxd7 hg (even pawns and black’s are shattered)
or maybe better yet
18 Bxh6 Kxh6 (there was a reason for the queen to move to c2 and cover g6) 19 Nxd7 Bxd7 20 Qxd7 (pawn up)

These “brilliant” continuations end up in the same pawn-up material situation with black having fewer pieces making the position cramped so let’s back up to
14 Ne5 Qxc3+ 15 Kf1 Qxa1+ 16 Ke2 Qxa2+ (16 … Qxh1 17 Qxf7#) 17 Kf1 Qe6 18 Qd8+ Nf8 19 Be7 h6 20 Qxf8+ Kh7 and black always having the perpetual option with 17 … Qb1+ 18 … Qb2+ and if white plays Kf3 then Nxe5+ followed by Be6 leaves black a rook and knight up.

It seems like the tactical chances looked very attractive but weren’t quite there against proper tactical defense. The position makes me strongly prefer white after 15 O-O b5 16 Qxc6 Rb8 and getting the extra pawn leaves me still favoring 14 Qe8+

  1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Bg5 d5 4. Nc3 c6 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Nf3 Bb4 7. cxd5 exd5 8. Bd3 Qa5 9. Qc2 Ne4 10. Bxe4 Bxc3+ 11. bxc3 dxe4 12. Qxe4+ Kf8 13. Qe7+ Kg8 14. O-O h6 15. Bf4 Qxc3 16 Rfd1 threatens 17 Rac1 and 18 d5. It looks like Black is permanently undeveloped, or to get developed must lose material.

Thanks to both Kevin and Jeff.

Although both of you have come up with improvements for both players, it seems that at least I did not miss a spectacular tactical finish that would have earned this game a place in the hall of fame alongside The Immortal Game and The Evergreen Game.

Thanks again, guys.

Bill Smythe