This is a really good point. I played an Expert at this year’s US Open whose eyesight required an analog clock. A TD verified that he could not read a Chronos display (IMO, the easiest digital display to read), so I accepted the analog reality. I see the guy’s POV…the contrast of black analog arms against the white display make it easy to see how much time has elapsed.
If you are friends with a near-blind player…please encourage them to use a peg board, especially if they have difficulty distinguishing white plastic pieces from the white buff squares…this can clear up a LOT of misunderstanding!!!
I carry and use a boxwood/ebonized boxwood set (HOS Classic) and feel that it holds up pretty well. I’ve had cheaper sets where I had to “touch up” the ebonized pieces, but not this one – it’s held up pretty well (I don’t think they’re that hard to touch up, if it should ever become an issue). Another nice feature of the HOS sets is that you can replace an individual piece if it ever becomes chipped, broken, lost, etc.
PS I should also point out that I generally prefer long time controls, so this set hasn’t seen much abuse from time scrambles – so YMMV…
I talked to HOS earlier. I decided to purchase the classic rosewood chess set. I do like rosewood very much. I figure if they make billard sticks from rosewood… using it in a chess set should be a walk in the park.
This is an example where the USCF differs from FIDE. In Europe very often knobs of different colors are quite common, at least this was the case between 1970-1990. Hopefully that was what prompted them to remove this silly sentence.