At one time, there was an option where you could use two GMs instead of three IMs to meet the minimum titleholder requirement for an IM RR norm tournament. However, I can’t seem to locate that verbiage now. (It’s been over a year since I last looked at the requirements, and these have an effective date of 7/1/14.)
So, my question is, can an organizer still use two GMs in place of three IMs to meet the minimum titleholder requirement, or must there now be three GM/IM titleholders in the field? Thanks in advance.
Those “equivalencies” went away in the 2014 revision to the title norm regulations. Under the current regulations, for an IM norm in a nine round event, the player must face at least three GM or IM opponents. (For completeness, for a WGM norm, the requirement is 3 GM/IM/WGM opponents; for a WIM norm, 3 GM/IM/WGM/WIM opponents.)
Thanks. I was doing a little research for an organizer who wants to put together a norm event. I’m glad I re-read the regulations before answering his question on that in the affirmative.
Actually, I think the change was made in 2013, not 2014. I checked the 2013 version of the Arbiter’s Manual, and the title regulations therein did not have the equivalencies. But I do remember them from the FA seminar back in 2010.