Others may remember it differently, but as I recall when the house player exception was created by the Delegates at the 1990 US Open in Jacksonville, it was with the clear understanding that house players need not be current USCF members.
Here’s the relevant portion of DM 90-79:
While the USCF office may have ‘interpreted’ that rule a variety of ways over the years, to my knowledge the Delegates have not revised the policy they established.
Most of the time, house players are current or former USCF members. Since the reason for having house players is to balance out an odd number of players without materially affecting the tournament, using a rated former member who fits into the ‘hole’ in the tournament field is a reasonable tool to give TDs.
For that reason, requests to grant an exception to the membership requirement for a house player will be examined to see if the player really looks like a house player. By that, I mean someone who isn’t among the highest rated or highest scoring players in the section, and in most cases did not play in every round. There will also be limits on the number of house players in any round.
Those who don’t meet those criteria will have to be reviewed manually.
If I was setting the rules (which I’m not, I’m just applying them), I would only permit as house players those who already have a USCF ID and a published rating.
Using an unrated non-member as a house player is a lot riskier choice for the TD unless he or she has some reasons to believe that such a house player is a reasonable match for the player who would otherwise have gotten a bye or been paired in a different score group.
The Exception Request Form does have the necessary fields (name, address, birthdate) to issue a USCF ID to someone who doesn’t already have one, though it is also possible for the ID to be issued through the membership module on TD/A.
The ‘not a USCF member’ coding was added to MSA to specifically denote those individuals who have never been USCF members but have been assigned USCF ID’s. This includes JTP’s. We did this because TDs were doing a bad job of checking the current membership expiration date for those individuals.
The USCF’s lax enforcement of the membership rules has led to many duplicate IDs being assigned.
Under the new ratings software, whether an event is submitted online, on diskette or on paper, we will enforce Rule 23C.