Challenger to the World Champion winner of Anand - Carlsen match will be determined in the 8-player Candidates tournament in 2014.
These will be the 8 Candidates players (note that the ratings used were average for the year ending in July 2013):
Anand (IND) or Carlsen (NOR) - loser of the match
Kramnik (Rus) - World Cup
Andreikin (Rus) - World Cup
Aronian (Arm) - Rating
Karjakin (Rus) - Rating
Topalov (Bul) - Grand Prix
Mamedjarov (Aze) or Grischuk (Rus) or Caruana (Ita) - Grand Prix
Organizer’s wildcard - has to be rated 2725+ in July 2013
The only way left for Hikaru Nakamura is the organizer’s wildcard. Organizers who so far announced that they are bidding for the Candidates tournament are Khanty-Mansiysk (Russia) and Kozlodoi (Bulgaria). It appears, the quickest way for Hikaru to challenge Magnus, should he beat Anand and get the title, is for USCF to quit FIDE, and issue a direct challenge like in the good ol’ days.
Sometimes chess players have limited vision, by reading written rules. Rules are often changed to meet new circumstances, that were not considered before. Bids could appear from anywhere. Anything could happen.
Think outside your box, and you might make better moves. That is true for anyone.
Not if we get rid of the ridiculous 2200 life master floor! Do players who constantly hit that 2200 floor really like have a rating that is considered to be a joke by most players? I would rather have a 2000 rating that is respected then a 2200 rating that people saw as a joke!
Lost by move 14, with Caruana having indicated, “…after this there wasn’t a lot of sense in continuing playing.” according to http://chess-news.ru/en/node/13497
And this should be a very instructive game for teachers to demonstrate what, “taking with the wrong pawn,” means.